Pages

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Letter to the Editor: Dan Ford vs. Town of Alma, A Layperson's Take-Away

Letter to the Editor:

On 18 July, 2019, NY State Supreme Court Judge Moriarty issued a fair and reasonable ruling: Dan Ford is the Town of Alma Highway Superintendent.    As an attendee of the proceedings, it was clearly evident that there hasn't been a legal interruption of his term in office, there has only been illegal interference.  The interference was due to scrap monies and how it was handled.  It was considered a 'theft' by the current town supervisor despite prior administrations, both town and Highway, handling scrap monies in the same way.  The town supervisor's vision of how things should be now is what prompted him and, possibly other board members, to interpret certain town laws to fit their agenda resulting in the creation of Resolution 1-2019 which forced Mr. Ford to purchase his own bond. 
The town supervisor claimed that Mr. Ford's bond had been dropped due to inappropriate handling of scrap monies.  It was determined that the bond the town supervisor claimed had been dropped, in reality was never dropped and it isn't a “bond”, it is a blanket insurance policy covering all town employees.  This policy only has two (2) names on it, the town supervisor's and the town clerk's.   Mr. Ford was forced to purchase a bond and the resolution clearly stated that the town would reimburse him for the expense.  Mr. Ford, purchased two (2) bonds and the town refused to reimburse him for them.  Judge Moriarty ruled that the town, as per their own resolution, must reimburse Mr. Ford in full.  Remember, Mr. Ford had never been dropped from the original blanket policy. 
Mr. Ford hasn't received payment of his wages since March 7, 2019 and the town's attorney argued that as the town board was not recognizing Mr. Ford as Highway Superintendent he was “donating his time” to the town.   Judge Moriarty did not agree with that and ruled that Mr. Ford was to be paid his back wages and current wages moving forward.  
Listening to Judge Moriarty go through each request, I believed that he was fair.  His most important finding was that Mr. Ford is, and has been the Alma Highway Superintendent.  He did dismiss the individual suits against each board member and the town clerk but the suit against the board as a whole will be moving forward.  He instructed the town to continue to maintain the blanket policy and to continue Mr. Ford's benefits. 
My take-away from watching this play out in the courtroom was simple, all of this could have been avoided if there had been communication between the town board and the Highway Superintendent as there had been for decades prior to this.  The town of Alma used to have a governing body that would work together with the Highway Department and the Taxpayers.  Now it seems that there is no communication and plans are made behind closed doors, away from those who might ask “Why”.  Residents feel that hoops must now be jumped through and permissions granted before being allowed to address the town board when previous boards encouraged public participation.  A former town supervisor said many times that she “wished more people would get involved and come to meetings”.  Her wish has been granted but not for the reasons she wanted.  Residents now fill the town hall because they are frustrated with what is going on and how the board has distanced themselves from the people, they are supposed serve.  The board chooses to mimic other towns instead of answering questions.  The board feels that they're being attacked.  That is understandable as there are times when frustrations boil over but this could be avoided if the board were more accessible. 
A representative for the board said “the town did the best it could” but that isn't accurate.  The “town” is a collective of its residents and the residents weren't shy about going to Mr. Ford and asking questions.  The board chose to close down all communication and act as judge and jury, denying Mr. Ford due process and costing the town tens of thousands of dollars.  For a board that claims to be doing this out of fiscal responsibility their actions speak louder than their words.
It is time for all of this to come to a close, for elected individuals to understand their rolls and for Alma to move forward.
Submitted by:
Heather Trask
Paula Clayson